ࡱ> ed#(w / 0DArialNew Ro9L60Wo 0DAngsana New9L60Wo 0 DTimes New Roman60Wo 0 ` . @n?" dd@  @@`` 0(\~ >>   _ 0AA @NR ʚ;no8ʚ;g4LdLd0ppp@ <4dddd 0L7 <4!d!d. 0L<4BdBd. 0L%___PPT10DTimes New Romanķ0ķ:A 0DArial Unicode MS0ķ:A 0 DArialUnicode MS0ķ:A 0" 6___PPT9xp  ?  %CDeveloping National Governance Indicators: the outcome of New DelhiDDD $Metagora Forum Paris, 24-25 May 2005%%%  UNDP and Governance Fostering Democratic Governance is the second-largest UNDP thematic area. Results from UNDP Country Offices underscore that UNDP is strongly positioned as lead agency for supporting democratic governance for poverty reduction. A reason for this strength is UNDP s ability to establish and promote national dialogue on key development issues. It is anticipated that there will be a continued strong demand for UNDP support in all of its 7 service lines in the Democratic Governance thematic area.P*   fUNDP-ICSSR Technical Workshop on Governance Indicators for Pro-Poor and Gender Sensitive Policy reformggg  The purpose of the April 2005 UNDP-ICSSR Workshop was to: Develop a common framework for identifying national governance indicators in the countries to be included in UNDP s pilot project on Governance Indicators for Pro-Poor and Gender Sensitive Policy Reform;P;ZZ:FG*  Y Review and appraise existing methods and tools for measuring governance at national and sub-national levels; and Identify and discuss best practices and lessons learned from national efforts to use governance indicators for policy-making. 8q~ !Integrated Indicator Matrix (IIM)"" " X The various methodological contributions of the workshop were pulled together in the IIM for each of UNDP s 7 service lines. Each matrix contains a distinction between: Different meanings of the terms pro-poor and gender sensitive; Objective and subjective governance indicators; Different types of objective governance indicators; Different generations of governance indicators; and Core and satellite governance indicators. h" } ,*f  A  IIM (continued)  The IIM: Offers a clearer understanding of and allows more control over the process of indicator selection; Provides a framework for monitoring evolution of governance indicators over time; and Presents information in a way which invites policy analysis. IIMs alone are however not sufficient for selecting governance indicators . They need to be complemented by other instruments such as process flow charts. | PPPP*     Rationale of Pilot Study  UNDP has not yet developed indicators for each of its service lines which are pertinent to assessing impact of UNDP s interventions. It is however acknowledged that it is difficult to develop indicators which assess UNDP s interventions exclusively. Impacts will also depend on the interventions of governments as well as other donors. It is nevertheless hoped that the pilots will provide better guidance to UNDP staff on country-level indicators.ZFo  c    'Suggested objectives of the pilot study(( ( Identification of first and second generation pro-poor and gender sensitive governance indicators (GI) across UNDP s 7 governance service lines. Explore/promote innovatory ways of using GI. Achieve  learning-by-doing and promoting capacity development. Generate reliable information on the cost of producing and disseminating GI. LZL*n    Follow-up work on Pilot Study R Depending on resources available follow-up work could entail: Revised pro-poor and gender sensitive, non-ranking, GIs could be rolled out for a larger group of countries; and/or Results of the pilot could provide basis for more refined work on GIs in the same set of pilot countries (allowing for testing of second generation indicators.>?Z" Z?S   ` 33` Sf3f` 33g` f` www3PP` ZXdbmo` \ғ3y`Ӣ` 3f3ff` 3f3FKf` hk]wwwfܹ` ff>>\`Y{ff` R>&- {p_/̴>?" dd@,|?" dd@   " @ ` n?" dd@  @@``PR    @ ` ` p>> &(    6o  `}  X Click to edit Master title style!!   0Dr  `  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!    S   0Hw ^ `  P*   0| ^   ^*   0` ^ `  ^* B  s *޽h ? 3380___PPT10.9\4} Default Design} 0$(  r  S 0   r  S  ` 0  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.9\9}+D=' = @B +}  @@$(  @r @ S $0  `  0 r @ S 0 ` 0 H @ 0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.T\@*N+D=' = @B +}  P $(   r  S D0 `}  0 r  S 0P ` 0 H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.9\pZ+D=' = @B +  `(  r  S 00 ` 0 H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.9\p؆+D=' = @B +:  p:(  r  S 00 `0  0   S 0 ` 0 "p`PpH  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.9\0}  T "SS ^^XR(  X X Bt U ""  Q D<C X# #"6* n!!!!!L X <?N<C T  @` X <|?NC T  @` X <"? C T  @` X <)?  C T  @` X <0?  C T  @`  X <>? C Expenditure on special programmes in civic and voter education targeted at women [G1] No of women covered by special programmes in civic and voter education [G1] Ratio of female to male voters in elections [G1]pV } U## K## 0#  @`L  X <J?sC Input Output Outcome|  ## # #  ##   @`$  X <U?sC Objective SubjectiveT    ## #  @`  X <F?*C T  @`  X <0f?D*C  POVERTY-BLIND* #   @` X <l?NN < T  @`, X <w?N N HNo of exclusively female focus groups in poor districts indicating that it was  common for women to vote as instructed by father, husband or other male figure [G2]( #  @` X <~? N  T  @` X <<? N  T  @` X <h? N  T  @` X <?N  T  @`L X < ?sN  Input Output Outcome|  ## # #  ##   @`, X <?N s Objective Subjective\    ## # #    @` X <?*N  .Result of poor-empowered statistical processes(/ .#/  @` X <?DN * T  @`I X <d?N <N  aAverage time (minutes) required to vote in state/national elections (travel, queuing, voting)[G3],b a## b  @`I X <? NN  aNo of female legislators in state/national assemblies experiencing sexual harassment at work [G2],b a## b  @` X < ? N  T  @` X <? N  T  @` X <8? N  T  @` X <? N  T  @`L X <?s N  Input Output Outcome|  ## # #  ##   @`$ X <? sN  Objective SubjectiveT    ## #  @`  X < ?* N  ~Chosen by poor( #  @` !X <?D *N  T  @` "X <0?Nt <  T  @` #X <8$?t N  T  @` $X <+? t   T  @` %X <2? t  T  @` &X <0:? t  T  @` 'X <A?t  T  @`L (X <B?st   Input Output Outcome|  ## # #  ##   @`$ )X <`X?t s  Objective SubjectiveT    ## #  @` *X <a?*t   Implicitly pro-poor( #  @` +X <Lh?Dt *  T  @` ,X <o?N<t  T  @` -X <w?Nt  T  @` .X <~? t  T  @` /X <dy?  t  T  @` 0X <?  t  T  @` 1X <,? t  T  @`L 2X <P?st  Input Output Outcome|  ## # #  ##   @`$ 3X <?st  Objective SubjectiveT    ## #  @` 4X <?*t  Specific to poor( #  @` 5X <H?D*t  T  @` 6X <?N< T  @` 7X <?N T  @` 8X <@?  T  @` 9X <?   T  @` :X <?   T  @`J ;X <? H@8___PPT10 Expenditure targeted on increasing female voter registration in poor electoral districts [G2] % of eligible females registered as voters in poor electoral districts [G2] Voter turn-out (%) among registered females in poor districts [G2] % of females >18 yrs in poor electoral districts considering electoral process  relevant to their lives [G2]^  ]## K## B## m#[  @`L X <@?* Economic-status disaggregated( #  @`8 ?X <<?D*@80___PPT10 |PRO-POOR, (" "   @` @X <#?N+< T  @` AX <,?+N *Result of engendered statistical processes(+ *#+  @` BX <5? + Chosen by women (men)( #  @` CX <0? +  Implicitly gendered( #  @` DX <PG? +  Gender-specific( #  @` EX <LP?+  Sex-disaggregated( #  @` FX <X?N<+  GENDER-BLIND, ( #    @` GX <4b?N+ GENDER-SENSITIVE,(#   @` HX <i?D T  @` IX <s?D<@80___PPT10 dTABLE 1: INTEGRATED INDICATOR MATRIX FOR GOVERNANCE SERVICE AREA 2 - ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES*e d" "e  @`ZB JX s *1 ?D<ZB KX s *1 ?DC<CZB LX s *1 ?DDCZB MX s *1 ?<<CZB NX s *1 ?D<ZB OX s *1 ?D<ZB PX s *1 ?CZB QX s *1 ?+CZB RX s *1 ?+<+ZB SX s *1 ?NNCZB TX s *1 ? + CZB UX s *1 ? + CZB VX s *1 ? + CZB WX s *1 ?D<ZB XX s *1 ?**CZB YX s *1 ?CZB ZX s *1 ?ssCZB [X s *1 ?Dt <t ZB \X s *1 ?D < ZB ]X s *1 ?DN <N ZB ^X s *1 ?D<B X s *޽h ? 33___PPT10i.`j+D=' = @B +}  $(  r  S  : `  : r  S <: ` : H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.9\J+D=' = @B +}  T$(  Tr T S : `  : r T S \: ` : H T 0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.[\ +D=' = @B +$  D$(  Dr D S : `}  : r D S  : ` : H D 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.Y\A:  H:(  Hr H S .: `}  :  H S /: ` : "p`PpH H 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.Y\ YNCr<p#-2_5j7 0U0ɒ D97COh+'0` hp   Slide 1 Nils TaxellKimonoxTom Heimgartner16 Microsoft PowerPointP@`&@09\@@65}vGBg  +& &&#TNPPT2OMi & TNPP &&TNPP    --- !---&/&w@1 u؟ww w f- &Gy& --y@-- @Arial ؟ww w f- .$2 Developing National+! !#$$$+"$!. .(2 .Governance Indicators:,$!!$!&" ## !. .+2 uuthe outcome of New Delhi#!#""6!"+2+!$.--1-- @Arial1 |؟ww w f- .2 BMetagora Forum"$. .2 ;  Paris, 24  . . 2 ;-. .2 ; 25 May 2005" .--"System f !-&TNPP &r՜.+,0x    Bildschirmprsentationundpchii  Arial Angsana NewTimes New RomanDefault DesignDDeveloping National Governance Indicators: the outcome of New DelhiUNDP and GovernancegUNDP-ICSSR Technical Workshop on Governance Indicators for Pro-Poor and Gender Sensitive Policy reformPowerPoint-Prsentation"Integrated Indicator Matrix (IIM)PowerPoint-PrsentationIIM (continued)Rationale of Pilot Study(Suggested objectives of the pilot studyFollow-up work on Pilot Study Verwendete SchriftartenEntwurfsvorlage Folientitel '_{0Tom HeimgartnerTom Heimgartner  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKMNOPQRSUVWXYZ[]^_`abcfRoot EntrydO)Current User\SummaryInformation(LPowerPoint Document(DocumentSummaryInformation8T